Відео

@9:10 physicists are in fact looking at mathematical symmetries, in the Lie groups. The "unification" is not truly well-defined because no one knows what the final structure of elementary particles must be, but since we have all the low energy broken symmetries we know what possibilities there are for larger groups. The groups are nothing but the instructions for how one particle "rotates" into another (in a topological space sense, not a literal spacetime sense). The proper unification in physics is to unite gravity with the SM of QM. That's also about groups too, since we'd need to know if gravity is purely global and has no need for a graviton, if it's all just gravitons then it requires a special difficult sort of theory (it is non-renormalizable, so cannot be "computational," and no one knows of a way around that, except by postulating maybe gravity is more global/classical and there are no gravitons). Note, if there are no gravitons then it'd be a good thing, since then the SM and gravity are already as united as they can get. Then spin-2 fields get left out of the Lorentzian path integral. Elementary particles can be in superposition, but not spacetime itself. There is a super cool unification then, the parameters in the group for GR vacuum have 36 gauge fields, they are particle-less (have no propagating modes) so are pure pure vacuum. BUt if the Hiiggs particle is actually composite, so not elementary, then these 36 zero-dimension fields would explain precisely why there are three generations of fermions. _Precisely._ I take this as a decent hint gravity should not be re-quantized (it is already a quantum theory, just not for gravitons). However, having a few gravitons is no problem, provided they are particles, not fields and so few of them there is no effective field theory for them. In this case graviton do not mess up the prediction of three generations, since the graviton is not a fermion. This is all just to say, if any mathematician reading this want a far simpler puzzle than Langlands, talk to me! The physics prizes are deeply mathematical. All about Lie groups. Contrary to popular myth, quantum mechanics is _more_ continuous than classical mechanics, not more "discrete". The discrete arises in QM because of topology/homology, but it is still smooth spacetime.

nobody asked any questions?!!!! I would have taken the opportunity ask even more about his churn and simmons theory a much more, even if it bothers him.

❤🎉

❤

Thanks for this interesting talk, in particular for trying to provide illustrations based on a simplest cases.

i wish i can attend the next one :( its look fun

To be a human and humble can make a story a part in the life all of us.

Thanks for a concise and clear advice.

Please consider Dr. Wildberger. I am a great fan.

beautiful explanation, mozart's homage to chopin.

Could AI be used to solve the hundred year old Millennium (math) Problems?

They did not change their mind.

Vous pouvez également réciter Avec NOUS ....OH AUGUSTE CORBEAU..A TU BULBES LES AUTRES,SONT AVEC TOI ...? CHER MAÎTRE AUGUSTE ,RÉSONNE ET IMITE LA PERSONNE ABSENT IL,A DIT SI UN OISEAU SUR ARBRE ,IL PARLE COMMENT ..? DONC,CHANTA.... PASSÉ ACTIF,DIT QUOI SI I(J...POLICIER) xxk..UN champs EST LA limite des chances ,.... DONC ,UNE chance EST quoi ... Fin de VIE..... NE JAMAIS REMODELER UNE THÈSE,UNE PENSÉE.... ET UNE CRITIQUE ....PRESQUE UNE PRIÈRE SANS MERCI..!? UN HOMME DIVIN N'EXISTE PAS LA DIVINITÉ DE L'HOMME.... A FAIRE COMPRENDRE AUX AUTRES ,UN DEVOIR À COMPLIR ACCOMPLISSEMENT ,DE L'AMITIÉ TALAGRAND@ MÉLANINE PAS DE PROBLÈME .. ON S'EXERCE: COLLER x DECOLLER y...,!«»? MICHEL,....... TALAGRAND ......

Congratulations! ^.^

Theoretical Physicists - mathematical philosophers- have long held back physics. The Atomic Expansion Equation is well worth knowing. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well..... everything. Mathematical ‘objects ‘, starting with Euclid’s “point” has been an abysmal descent into abstract noise.

Nice, impressive and very useful advice, thanks

Great advice! Many thanks 🙏🙏🙏

CLEVER FORAMT: Very nice open questions that are neither stupid nor too general yet understandable by the layman. The answers being on a par makes this a great video.

When do you know you should stop trying? Sure I can grind but sometimes it's just not enough

👏

My advice to young mathematicians:- You need an IQ over 160 to be successful in mathematics otherwise you're wasting your time.

I think he should get another prize for being the humblest mathematician in the world

Except nowadays "hard work" won't do the job. You'll need to be friends with the right people and have no academic freedom.

It is a privilege to hear the advice of one of the greatest living mathematicians! Thank you M. Talagrand!

Thank you

What a heartfelt encouragement

Probably the most beautiful song ever written and ever sung…Thank you, !🙏🏼

If I were awarded the Abel Prize, I would cry too.

The French should make a prize in honor of Fermat, Pascal & Poincare, three pioneering mathematicians.

Your channel is one of the best for gaining knowledge about trading. Thanks for your hard work!

Thanks for this, as a newbie it helps a lot

Le propre du génie c'est cette humilité éblouissante. Le travail et l'amour comme lignes directrices. Une vie de travail au service de la science et l'amour d'une vie pour une femme. J'admire ta noblesse Michel. Tu es parmi les grands de ce monde !

Happy to watch a video of Wiles explaining in his smooth style about this great proof, but I must fess up that I do have a lot to learn to be able to fully understand what is going on.

Thank you

Thank you for this engaging talk. I was suprised that Maharam's conjecture has a statement I can understand. Moreover, the additional remarks on the history of its solution were quite interesting, especially in the context of the advice Talagrand has been giving elsewhere about "not being afraid to be persistent"

I am amazed that his 64. HE SOUNDS AND LOOKS IN HIS FORTIES 😊😊😊

He needs the bandanna so people can tell he's cool and quirky. Oh, wait.

What a miracle! Thank you very much. The strategy works 100%. I tried 7 trades using this strategy, all of them were winning. I'm your fan.✨

I sincerely appreciate you. I UNDERSTOOD NOTHING before your videos and lost a few coins. I'm now profitable and on my way to saving a healthy account. Thank you!!!

Bravo Michel 😊

Wonderful lecture and many Congrats, Michel.

Amazing talk!

Thanks Sourav for a great lecture, and many congrats to Michel on winning the Abel Prize. A very-well deserved win.

Thank you for this amazing talk, it's baffling how you are able to give a listener an insight into something so complex, in such a short time.

❤

"i can think of 50 mathematicians better than i am" - undercover flex

He didnt give anything away. "Its time series data". And so friken what, give us your method! NOW!

watching after 2 years .No questions? Audience is lame

What area of mathematics is this,I would to learn it so that I may understand what he is writing on the board

Brilliant lecture from a brilliant man❤